The bipartisan, multi-administration strategy to dominate global energy markets, weaken Russia, leverage China, and defend the petrodollar — explained.
This analysis represents the author's thesis. Some sections are speculative interpretations, while others are inspired by publicly available research, tweets, and insights from Dr. Anas Alhajji's paid subscription content on global oil, gas, energy, and geopolitics.
U.S. LNG exports are not merely a market phenomenon — they are a deliberate, bipartisan geopolitical strategy sustained across four administrations (Obama → Trump → Biden → Trump). The goal: replace Russian gas in Europe, create energy dependency leverage over China, defend the petrodollar system, defund Russia's war machine, and generate hundreds of billions in GDP. The U.S. government actively markets, subsidizes, sanctions, and diplomatically advances the private-sector LNG industry with a consistency that transcends any single party or president.
Energy Secretary Moniz fast-tracks LNG export approvals. Cheniere Energy receives the first-ever permit to export LNG. DOE approves 24 export licenses, denies zero. Japan and India energy dialogues initiated. Columbia CGEP founded by Obama energy advisor Jason Bordoff to build the intellectual case for exports.
Russia annexes Crimea. DOE begins explicitly emphasizing national security in LNG public interest determinations. Lithuania opens "Independence" LNG terminal at Klaipėda — the first Baltic facility to break Russian gas monopoly. Obama-EU joint statement announces support for increased LNG exports to Europe.
Obama signs budget bill lifting 40-year-old crude oil export ban. First-ever US LNG cargo departs Sabine Pass, Louisiana on February 24, 2016 — the shale revolution goes global. Congress passes bipartisan legislation supporting LNG export acceleration.
Trump markets US LNG as "freedom gas." Continues approving every LNG export application — zero policy change from Obama. Personally tours Cameron LNG export facility. Pressures Germany over Nord Stream 2. Imposes sanctions on Nord Stream 2 AG. US-China Phase One deal includes $52.4B fossil fuel purchase pledge.
Russia invades Ukraine. Biden forms US-EU Task Force on Energy Security. Pledges 15 bcm of LNG to Europe — exporters deliver 56 bcm (almost 4× the target). US becomes world's largest LNG exporter. Nord Stream 1 pipelines sabotaged. Nord Stream 2 killed politically.
Trump reverses Biden's LNG permit pause on Day One. Greenlights five new LNG projects. US supplies 57% of Europe's LNG (70% in some months). EU commits to $750B US energy procurement. US LNG capacity set to double by 2028. Sanctions expanded on Russian LNG terminals.
Russia supplied 45% of EU gas in 2021 and used it as a political weapon for decades — pricing favorably for allies, cutting off dissenters. Gazprom's 2022 cutoffs were designed to fracture European solidarity over Ukraine. The plan: permanently sever this dependency so Russia can never use gas as leverage again.
At pre-war levels, Europe was sending Russia ~$1 billion per day for fossil fuels. Gazprom reported a $6.9B loss in 2023 and $12.9B in 2024 — its first losses in 20+ years. Revenue fell 41%, production down 25%. A 71% surge in Russian corporate debt is squeezing the entire economy. The strategy is working.
As European gas demand eventually declines under climate targets, the window to lock in US LNG contracts is now. Over 20 long-term contracts signed since 2022. Two new Gulf Coast terminals (Plaquemines, Corpus Christi Stage 3) came online in late 2024. US capacity set to double by 2028.
US Gulf Coast LNG to Europe traverses the open Atlantic — no Persian Gulf, no Suez Canal, no Red Sea (currently threatened by Houthis). Shorter distances than Asia-bound cargoes with no Panama Canal fees. This makes US LNG uniquely reliable for European energy security.
China became the world's largest LNG importer in 2023. Despite being geopolitical rivals, the US and China are now deeply tied in energy: China imports US fossil fuels while the US imports Chinese clean energy tech. The "deep state" logic: if China depends on US LNG, Washington gains leverage it wouldn't otherwise have over Beijing — especially as a counterweight to China's dominance in rare earths and solar manufacturing.
The US-China trade deficit hit $295B+. During the first trade war, Beijing pledged to buy $52.4B in US fossil fuels. Since 2018, Chinese buyers and US suppliers have signed 20+ long-term LNG contracts. LNG trade was becoming a rare area of mutual economic gain — until tariff escalation in 2025 froze shipments.
China's economic growth outpaces its clean energy production — it must import coal, oil, and gas in record volumes. DOE's own study identifies China as the likely dominant destination for US LNG by 2050. If China depends on US supply, it's more exposed to sanctions, supply disruptions, and US political leverage.
Without US LNG, China deepens ties with Russia (Power of Siberia pipeline), Qatar, and Iran. Every US LNG cargo China buys is a cargo NOT bought from a US adversary. If China shifts permanently to Russian gas, it reduces US leverage and funds Russia. The deep state wants to prevent this decoupling.
In 2023, China executed its first yuan-settled LNG trade with TotalEnergies. BRICS nations are actively trying to de-dollarize energy trade. Every US LNG contract denominated in dollars reinforces dollar dominance. If energy trade shifts to yuan, the US loses its ability to run deficits, print currency, and impose sanctions.
DOE uses "public interest" determinations with a rebuttable presumption in favor of exports. After 2014, national security became an explicit factor. No president has ever denied an LNG export license. The approval apparatus runs on autopilot regardless of who holds the White House.
Nord Stream 2 killed politically via bipartisan sanctions. Nord Stream 1 physically destroyed. Arctic LNG 2 sanctioned (including Chinese fabrication yards supplying it). Russian LNG terminals directly targeted. EU banning Russian LNG re-exports and phasing out all imports by 2027.
US-EU Task Force on Energy Security (2022). EU $750B energy procurement commitment. Presidents personally touring LNG facilities and marketing gas to foreign leaders. Congressional Energy Export Caucus providing bipartisan legislative cover.
Long-term LNG contracts are denominated in USD (Henry Hub indexed). Project financing requires take-or-pay agreements with creditworthy foreign buyers. This embeds the dollar into 20-30 year energy infrastructure commitments globally — the petrodollar's next chapter.
Forget rare earths. The real reason the US wants Greenland is transport corridor security. Greenland anchors the western edge of the GIUK Gap (Greenland-Iceland-United Kingdom) — the critical maritime chokepoint that every Russian submarine, warship, and LNG tanker must pass through to reach the Atlantic. As Arctic ice melts, three new shipping routes are opening that will reshape global trade. Whoever controls Greenland controls access between the Arctic and Atlantic oceans — and thus controls the security of every LNG tanker, cargo ship, and undersea cable transiting the North Atlantic.
The GIUK Gap is the maritime chokepoint between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK. Every Russian ship leaving Kola Peninsula bases must transit it to reach the Atlantic. NATO has monitored it since WWII — with undersea sensors, patrol aircraft, and anti-submarine warfare capabilities. Greenland is the western anchor of this entire surveillance architecture.
Russia's Northern Fleet — 32+ warships, 33+ submarines, including nuclear-armed ballistic missile subs — is based on the Kola Peninsula. Russian submarine activity near the GIUK Gap now equals or surpasses Cold War levels. In 2019, 10 Russian subs simultaneously tested their ability to breach the gap undetected. Control of Greenland keeps this gate shut.
China has declared itself a "near-Arctic state" and launched the Polar Silk Road initiative — trial voyages along the Northern Sea Route linking Shanghai to St. Petersburg. Chinese firms have stakes in Russia's Arctic LNG projects and have supplied key equipment for them. Chinese companies sought to build airports and deep-water ports in Greenland — the US pressured Denmark to reject them.
US LNG tankers crossing the Atlantic to Europe avoid the Suez Canal, Red Sea (Houthi threats), and Persian Gulf chokepoints. But they DO transit waters adjacent to the GIUK Gap. As Arctic routes open, LNG carriers will increasingly use northern passages. Greenland provides the surveillance and interdiction capability to secure these energy lifelines — or deny them to adversaries.
The North Atlantic seabed carries critical undersea communications cables and pipeline infrastructure. Russia's shadowy GUGI unit (officially "deep-sea research") operates 50+ vessels designed for intelligence gathering, seabed installation, and sabotage of pipelines and cable networks. Greenland-based monitoring is essential to protect this invisible infrastructure layer.
Pituffik Space Base (formerly Thule Air Base) in northern Greenland has operated since 1951 as a cornerstone of US missile early warning and space surveillance. Polar airspace is the shortest trajectory between major industrial centers of the Northern Hemisphere. As Russia deploys new hypersonic weapons, Greenland's position becomes even more critical for detection and deterrence.
Alaska anchors US Arctic strategy in the Pacific-Arctic. But Alaska cannot project power over transatlantic trade routes or the North Atlantic. Greenland complements Alaska by providing access to the North Atlantic and Europe, securing eastern Arctic trade routes, and closing the gap in North Pole claims. Together they form a complete Arctic security framework. Without Greenland, there's a gaping hole in America's northern perimeter.
Gulf Coast ships US LNG to Europe at record volumes — 70% of US cargoes in Jan 2025 went to Europe
New England imports LNG from Trinidad & Tobago because pipeline infrastructure has been blocked — costing consumers $10-20B/year
The Northeast has impeded ~5 billion cubic feet per day of pipeline capacity. Winter gas prices spike to $80–$300/MMBtu in New England while Henry Hub averages $2–4. The geopolitical export strategy takes priority over domestic distribution.
This analysis was inspired and informed by Dr. Anas Alhajji's research and compilations. Dr. Alhajji is one of the world's leading energy economists and analysts. We strongly advise all readers to become paid subscribers to his Substack for ongoing, expert-level energy intelligence.
Subscribe to Dr. Anas Alhajji's Substack →